Avora
A 2026 Avora Benchmark Report

The State of Case Presentation in Emerging Dental Groups

Avora's AI listened to, transcribed, and scored 35,000+ real patient visits across emerging dental groups — every data point in this report comes directly from those recordings.

Book a Demo
Framework

Case Presentation Framework

This is the framework we used to grade the doctors in the sample against their production data. Every group runs case presentation a bit differently, but we needed one rubric we could apply across every visit — so we went with a standard six-step version.

Scorecard

The Full Scorecard

The eight behaviors we graded, grouped by step. Click any row for an example of what it actually sounds like in the chair.

01

Introduction & Understanding

Assistant / TC
Assistant / TC
+29pt gap
Before we jump in — what brought you in today? Anything new since your last visit you want me to flag for the doctor?
02

Diagnostics & Comfort

Assistant
Doctor
+38pt gap
Let me pull your X-ray up on the screen here. See this darker area right here on 14? Now compare it to this one over here — that's what a healthy tooth looks like.
03

Findings & Recommendations

Doctor
Doctor
+43pt gap
Remember that cold sensitivity you mentioned on your upper right? This is where it's coming from — the enamel's worn thin right here and the nerve's getting exposed.
Doctor
+51pt gap
Here's what I'd recommend: let's get a crown on 14 to get ahead of it, and we'll do the two fillings the same visit so you're not back in the chair twice.
Doctor
+43pt gap
If we wait six months on this, the decay's going to reach the nerve. What's a crown today becomes a root canal plus a crown — and a lot more chair time.
04

Treatment Plan & Handoff

Doctor → TC
Doctor
+50pt gap
Sarah's going to walk you through the scheduling and the cost side, but before I step out — any questions on the plan itself?
Doctor → TC
+49pt gap
Sarah, this is Mrs. Johnson. She's getting a crown on 14 and two fillings on 18 and 19. Let's get her on the calendar for next week if that works for her.
05

Costs & Scheduling

TC
TC
+45pt gap
Totally get it — is it the timing, the cost, or something else on your mind? Let me see what we can work out on our end.
Production Signal

Lower Scores, Lower Production

We pulled production data for the doctors in the sample and lined it up against a couple of the scorecard behaviors above. The ones who graded higher on these tended to run higher daily production.

ADP Quartile< $2.2k$2.2–3.2k$3.2–4.2k$4.2k+Median ~$3.2k/day

Path ownership

The doctor names a clear path forward, gives a confident recommendation, and stays the owner of the next step — instead of handing the patient an open-ended menu of options to think about later.

$2k$3k$4k$5k0%20%40%60%80%100%n ≈ 4,800 visits

Urgency framing

The doctor explains what changes if the patient waits — what the problem will look like in six months, what stays fixable now, what doesn't. Adds urgency without sounding like a sales pitch.

$2k$3k$4k$5k20%30%40%50%60%n ≈ 4,800 visits

See how your team scores.

Avora analyzes every patient visit against the same scorecard used in this report — so you know exactly where path ownership, urgency framing, and the handoff are working in your group, and where they aren't.

Get your group's scorecard